Larkin, Yelena. 2012. Three Essays On Financial Policy Of A Firm. Doctoral Dissertation,
Cornell University.
The first chapter of the
dissertation analyzes how characteristics of a firm's brand affect financial
decisions by using a proprietary database of consumer brand evaluation. It
demonstrates that positive consumer attitude alleviates financial frictions by
providing more net debt capacity, as measured by higher leverage and lower cash
holdings. Brand perception reduces the overall riskiness of a firm, as strong
consumer evaluations translate into lower future cash flow volatility, higher
Z-scores, and better performance during recession. Creditors favor strong
brands by demanding lower yields on corporate public bonds. The results are
more pronounced among small firms and non-investment grade bonds, contradicting
a number of reverse causality and omitted variables explanations. The second
chapter develops a framework that shows how exactly market timing and trade-off
forces coexist. The idea is that market timing benefits dominate trade-off
costs when firms are close to their target leverage, but become offset by the
rebalancing considerations when firms are farther away. Two sets of empirical
results support the validity of the framework. First, the sensitivity of equity
issuances to past stock performance is the highest among firms close to the
target leverage. Second, the long-run performance of equity issuers is also a
function of their deviation from target leverage. The lower the leverage of
issuing firms is relative to the target, the worse their after-issuance returns
are, consistent with higher market timing incentives compared to other issuers.
The third chapter studies whether investors value dividend smoothing stocks
differently by exploring the implications of dividend smoothing for firms'
expected returns and their investor clientele. First, it demonstrates that
dividend smoothing is associated with lower average stock returns in both
univariate and multivariate settings. Some of this return differential can be
attributed to lower risk, captured by return comovement among high (low)
smoothing firms. Second, the chapter shows that institutional investors, and
specifically, mutual funds, are more likely to hold dividend smoothing stocks.
Last, firms that smooth their dividends issue equity more frequently. Together,
these results are consistent with the role of dividend smoothing in mitigating
the impact of agency conflicts on the cost of capital.
No comments:
Post a Comment