Han, Qian. 2010. Equilibrium
Market Prices Of Risks And Risk Aversion In A Complete Stochastic Volatility
Model With Habit Formation: Empirical Risk Aversion From S&P 500 Index
Options. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University.
Considering a pure exchange
economy with habit formation utility, the theoretical part of this dissertation
explores the equilibrium relationships between the market pricing kernel, the
market prices of risks and the market risk aversion under a continuous time
stochastic volatility model completed by liquidly traded put options. We
demonstrate with these equilibrium relations that the risk neutral pricing
partial differential equation is a restricted version of the fundamental
pricing equation provided in Garman (1976). We also show that in this completed
market stochastic volatility cannot explain the documented empirical pricing
kernel puzzle (Jackwerth (2000)). Instead, a habit formation utility offers a
possible explanation of the puzzle. The derived quantitative relation between
the market prices of risks and the market risk aversion also provides a new way
to extract empirical market risk aversion. Based upon this theoretical relation
between market prices of risks and the market risk aversion in a Heston model,
we empirically extract the market prices of risks and risk aversion from the
options market using cross-sectional fitting. Specifically we consider a restricted
model where only the volatility risk is allowed to freely change and an
unrestricted model where all model parameters are allowed to freely change. For
the restricted model, we determine other parameters by Efficient Method of
Moments (EMM). Using European call options data, we find an implied risk
aversion smile, indicating that individual groups of investors trading options
with different strike prices have different risk aversions. We also extracted
an average or aggregated market risk aversion by minimizing the mean squared
pricing error across all strikes. This represents the risk aversion level for
the whole market in the sense of "averaging". None of these risk
aversions are negative across moneyness, hence indicating that adding stochastic
volatility to the model will not reproduce the documented pricing kernel
puzzle. In addition, the market price of volatility risk is small in values
compared with the market price of asset risk, implying that the major driving
factor of market risk aversion and pricing kernel is the asset risk. This is
consistent with the sensitivity analysis conducted on the option prices with
respect to the market prices of risks. For the unrestricted model, we observe
similar behavior for the two market prices of risks using a different data set,
S&P500 index futures options. We find that the asset risk and volatility
risk premium generally move opposite across the strikes. The variation of
volatility risk decreases and the absolute values converge to zero with longer time
to maturity. So the asset risk dominates the pricing more for options with
longer maturities.
No comments:
Post a Comment