Monday, March 24, 2014

The Capital Asset Pricing Model Theory, Econometrics, and Evidenc

In this thesis three aspects of the CAPM model are investigated. The first aspect is the theoreticalbackground of the model. Here, mean-variance analysis (MVA) is thoroughly examined. We first present mathematical arguments from utility theory that can motivate the implementation of MVA. Then, we examine efficient portfolios in a mean-standard deviation space assuming there is no risk-free asset. We show the incentive to diversify ones portfolio and derive the efficient frontierconsisting of the portfolios with the maximum expected return for a given variance. Using mathematical and economic arguments, we find out that the market portfolio consisting of all risky assets is mean-variance efficient. We then include a riskless asset in the analysis and get the Capital Asset Market Line (CML) in a mean-standard deviation space. We argue that this is the efficient frontier when a risk-free rate exists. We also present the separation theorem which implies that all investors will maximize utility in some combination between the risk-free asset and the market portfolio. Based on the CML, we derive the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) in three differentways. The first two represent the original approaches from the architects behind the model. The last approach extends the formal derivation of the efficient frontier when only risky assets exist to include the risk-free rate. We find that the CAPM relates the expected return on any asset to its beta.
We argue that when investors only care about expected return and variance, beta makes sense as arisk measure. As beta is based on the covariance of returns between an asset and the market portfolio, it follows that CAPM only rewards investors for their portfolios responsiveness to swings in the overall economic activity. We find that this makes sense, as rational investors can diversify away all but the systematic risk of their portfolios. In the second part of the thesis, the econometric methods for testing the CAPM are developed. First, the traditional model is rewritten in order to work with excess returns. We then focus on testing the mean-variance efficiency of the market portfolio. We impose the assumption that returns are independent and identically distributed and jointly multivariate normal. Based on this assumption, we derive the joint probability density function (pdf) of excess returns conditional on the market risk premium. Using this pdf we first derive maximum likelihood estimators of the market model parameters. We then show that they are, in fact, equivalent to the ordinary least squares estimators.
A number of different test statistics are derived based on these estimators. The first is an asymptoticWald type test. We then transform this test into an exact F-test. Moreover, we develop anasymptotic likelihood ratio test including a corrected version with better finite-sample properties.
Also, noting that the above distributional assumptions are rather strict, we use the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) framework to develop a test robust to heteroskedasticity, temporal dependence and non-normality. 
Finally, we present some cross-sectional tests of other implications of the CAPM. Specifically, we develop statistics to check whether the empirical market risk premium is significant and positive and whether other risk measures than beta have explanatory power regarding expected excess returns. The third part of the thesis is an empirical study. It starts out by discussing a number of relevant topics regarding the implementation of the statistical tests. In specific, we discuss the choice of proxies, the sample period length and frequency, and the construction of the dependant variable.
Then, the tests are carried out on a 30 year sample of American stocks. For the overall period, we cannot reject the mean-variance efficiency of the proxy for the market portfolio. However, for the sub-periods of 5 years, the results are not so clear-cut. We also find that the empirical risk premium is not significant. The last point clearly contradicts the CAPM framework.

No comments:

Das Kapital

Das Kapital by Karl Marx My rating: 5 of 5 stars Karl Marx's Capital can be read as a work of economics, sociology and history. He...